Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Israel should be a better friend

By DeWayne Wickham

The unspoken message that the Obama administration appeared to send Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week is this: Stop behaving like an ungrateful friend.

Ever since Netanyahu's government blindsided Vice President Biden during his recent visit to the Jewish state with an announcement that it will build 1,600 new housing units in east Jerusalem, the Obama administration has been smarting.

And for good reason.

Of all the hurdles to an enduring peace deal between Israel and the Palestinians, the fate of Jerusalem - which both claim as their capital - is the most daunting. Every time Israel breaks ground on more housing there, the peace lamps flicker.

Reeling from Israel's announcement, the Obama administration urged Netanyahu to rescind the decision. In a phone call, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the prime minister that the new construction was "a deeply negative signal" about Israel's relationship with the United States. The Israeli government "needed to demonstrate not just through words but through specific actions" its commitment to that relationship and the peace process, Clinton said, according to State Department spokesman P. J. Crowley.

But in a speech last week in Washington to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Netanyahu thumbed his nose at these concerns. "Jerusalem is not a settlement; it's our capital," he proclaimed.

The United States is Israel's oldest and closest friend. And since its creation in 1948, Israel has been the largest cumulative recipient of American foreign aid. In addition to now receiving nearly $3 billion annually in grants from this country, Israel has gotten billions of dollars worth of loan guarantees since 1972 to help build housing and shore up its economy.

While Israel is forbidden from using any of this money to construct housing in its occupied territory, the largesse frees Israel to use other parts of its budget to fund such projects. Not to mention that without U.S. military assistance, Israel would struggle to fend off its enemies.

Our support of Israel is costly in non-monetary ways, too.

"The enduring hostilities between Israel and some of its neighbors present distinct challenges to our ability to advance our interests" in that part of the world, Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, told the Senate Armed Services Committee earlier this month. "Arab anger over the Palestinian question" hurts this country's relationship with other governments in the region and "weakens the legitimacy" of moderate Arab leaders, he said.

And while unemployment in Israel dropped to 7.4 percent in the last quarter of 2009, joblessness during that period in the United States hovered around 10 peercent.
The investment of treasure, and as Petraeus hinted, perhaps U.S. blood, on behalf of Israel should evoke deep gratitude. Instead, Netanyahu's government takes a go-it-alone approach when it serves Israel's interest - the rest of the world be damned.

The United States is right to champion Israel's right to exist, of course, and to provide an umbrella of protection to help ensure the Jewish state's survival.

But the Netanyahu government strains this longstanding friendship when it pursues a course of action that unnecessarily inflames passions in the Arab world and weakens the ability of moderate Arab leaders to talk peace.

2 comments:

Denny said...

I believe that you got it backward. We were the ones insulting Israel, not the way that you indicated. The insult was in response to Israel's management of their own democracy and nation.

David said...

DeWayne,
You need to learn something about the intricacies of the Middle East before you rattle off a boilerplate column in an area you know nothing about.

1. Netanyahu didn't know anything about the housing units. It was approved by a local planning board. it would be like blaming Obama for the building of an apartment building in Bethesda.

2. You throw the term East Jerusalem around as if this is a red line. The area where the new apartments were approved is in a Jewish neighborhood connected to West Jerusalem where Arabs have never lived.

3. They aren't even planning to build them for three years. So this would be perfectly in line with Oabama's moratorium.

4. Obama is the first President ever to ask Israel to stop building settlements. Even the Palestinians have never used building in Jerusalem as a pre-condition for negotiation. Obama was harder on Israel than the Palestinians!

5. "The investment of treasure, and as Petraeus hinted, perhaps U.S. blood, on behalf of Israel should evoke deep gratitude." Petreus explicitly said when asked that he did not mean Israel was causing Americans to be killed. Your statement is in the worst tradition of blood-libel against Jews.

6. Anything Israel does inflames Arabs. Israel existing inflames Arabs.

So he we have Obama creating an international incident over apartments in a Jewish neighborhood where Arabs never lived that is connected to Israel. An area that was never a stumbling block to talks until Obama made it one. And what happened the day after Obama made this request. The Palestinians rioted because Israel had re-opened a 150 year old Synagogue in WEST Jerusalem. See, building in West Jerusalem is an affront to Arabs too.

Let's also remember it is the Palestinians who are refusing to negotiate not the Israelis. The Palestinians who the dedicated a Square to the worst terroist in Israeli history when Biden arrived.